Are Interest Rates At The Breaking Point?

In markets, we often hear of these precise levels, beyond which everything is said to unravel.  The so-called “breaking point”.

Their allure is undeniable. If such a point existed, one could fully prepare for it in advance, exiting unscathed before the stampede of the masses.

Over the past few years, the most popular “breaking points” have been related to interest rates.

Starting with the first Federal Reserve hike in December 2015, which was said to be the “breaking point” for the economy/bull market, the predictions have been unrelenting. Hardly a day goes by now without some pundit throwing out a level on the 10-Year Yield (3%, 3.5%, 4%, etc.) or Fed Funds Rate (2%, 2.5%, 3%, etc.) that is said to be the level.

Do these “levels” have any basis in fact? Let’s take a look…

The 10-Year Treasury Yield is currently at 3.2%. After subtracting inflation of 2.3%, the real yield stands at 0.9%. Are such figures of any value in predicting equity market tops? Not exactly.

The table below illustrates the starting 10-Year Yield (nominal and real) at each of the Bear Markets in the S&P 500 going back to 1929. What you’ll notice is a total lack of uniformity from one Bear Market to the next. In 1946-47, stocks declined 28% from a starting 10-Year yield of just 2.21%, while in 1980-82 stocks declined 28% from a starting 10-Year Yield of 12.72%. Real yields show a similarly wide dispersion, with Bear Markets beginning with extremely low/negative real yields (1948-49) as well as extremely high real yields (1932-33).

The average 10-Year yield at the start of a Bear Market (5.04%) is not meaningfully different than the average in all periods going back to 1929 (4.97%). Neither is the average real 10-Year Yield (2.44% at the start of Bear Market vs. 1.86% in all periods).

Data Sources for all Charts/Tables Herein: Robert Shiller, FRED, Bloomberg.

What about the Fed Funds Rate?

Is there a magic level at which policy becomes “too restrictive” for markets? Again, not exactly. In 2011, stocks declined over 20% while the Fed was about as easy as it has ever been (0.2% nominal Fed Funds Rate, -3.4% real). Contrast this with July 1998, when the Fed was much more hawkish (+3.9% Real Fed Funds Rate) and stocks declined by roughly the same amount. The current Fed Funds Rate (2.19%) is still extremely low on a historical basis (4.90% average since 1954), but that fact should not serve as an all-clear to investors. A bear market can start at any time and at any level, regardless of Fed Policy.

That’s not to say that higher rates and more restrictive monetary policy do not act as an impediment to economic growth or stock market returns at times. It certainly does. But to suggest that there’s a precise level upon which this will necessarily happen is simply not how this game works.

When it comes to markets, there’s no such thing as a “breaking point”. The level at which investor appetite shifts from risk-seeking to risk-avoidance changes each and every day. And it’s the culmination of a multitude of factors, only one of which is interest rates.

Disclaimer: At Pension Partners, we use Bonds as our defensive position in our absolute return strategies for all of the above reasons. Bonds have provided a more consistent defensive alternative to ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Gary Anderson 5 years ago Contributor's comment

So, all this talk about neutral rates and inflation do not reveal the real reasons why the Fed breaks stuff. I think inflation is talked about as a reason, but perhaps asset inflation and workforce inflation carry a greater weight. Very interesting article.