Should Cable TV Fear AT&T DirecTV Now?

Should cable TV fear AT&T's DirecTV Now? Well, the answer is probably. If people need around a hundred dollars per month in savings, it makes sense to go with DirecTV Now. After all, it is not expensive anymore like the pure satellite service once was. It is a streaming service. 

However, it streams to devices. If you don't have a device for your TV, it won't stream to your TV. But AT&T, which took over DirecTV in 2015, is not adding satellite fees to the service as long as you are under contract. 

But there are a few issues with DirecTV Now. The service is only a few months old and there have been bugs. Frozen screens are a possibility. Improvement is likely. But for people who can afford the constant rise of cable prices, it may not be the best choice. That is not to say that cable is perfect when it comes to pixelation. It is far from perfect. 

And AT&T, which promotes DirecTV Now aggressively, has its own issues. It is not a user-friendly phone service and is one of the worst companies for customer service consistently in the polls. If you are fine with your AT&T phone, then maybe you will have reason to save some money with DirecTV Now. 

One would think that AT&T would get out of its own way when it comes to phone service customer care, just to reel more customers into the big money maker, bundled packages. But instead, Consumer Affairs has 807 reviews of the phone service with 1.5 stars out of five. That is horrendous. That should cause concern to AT&T management.

The problem arises from the fact that there are few decision makers in the AT&T chain of command. Lots of phone people work from home, with no access to supervisors. And nobody seems to have access to the back office to fix things unless you want to wait and wait, weeks. The phone management fixes things by being clever and by using their wits. It is a discombobulated mess. 

The question is, do you want to trade money for possible customer service difficulties? On the other hand, do you want to keep begging cable for your discounts? It is a strange system of uncertainty. It amounts to economic instability in the living room! We are talking about microstability here. With Trump, we have little macrostability, but with these large companies, the household finds itself under financial threat. One wrong move and they will apply their tools to make you squirm. 

You can get lots of channels with DirecTV and the cost ranges from 35 to 70 dollars per month, while cable channels go for north of $150 minus a discount for bundled service of around $25. 

I am old enough to remember roaming and unexpected charges. Things have gotten a lot better since those days of chaos. But more work needs to be done by these large conglomerates. 

So far, cable is fighting hard to stop people from switching to DirecTV. Perhaps the DISH is still a disease but recent toxic cable pricing is making too many of us feel a little sick. 

Cable is and will continue to entire the streaming wars kicking and fighting all the way. Comcast has a skinny streaming package. The kicking and fighting against this change is expected because it will undermine their main business, big money off of cable TV. Ultimately, streaming will win and cable will win a little, but only if it adapts. Oh, the humanity! 

Disclosure: I am not an investment counselor nor am I an attorney so my views are not to be considered investment advice. I have no financial interest in any company listed in this ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Alex Sandro 5 years ago Member's comment

AT & T Direct TV is good in services but you need devices to get the stream and also along with time it comes with some bugs. Spectrum in Kansas City gives you high quality video streaming without any contracts or hidden fees as compare to AT & T Direct TV.

Bruce Powers 5 years ago Member's comment

#Netflix is the real threat. $NFLX

Gary Anderson 5 years ago Contributor's comment

If the major cable companies like Charter offer alternatives they will prosper. If they don't, at a competitive price, their decline will continue. Direc TV is a viable alternative, still. I am rooting for the cable cimpanies as well, because competition and innovation are good things.

Frank Underwood 7 years ago Member's comment

I think cable should be more concerned with streaming services like #Netflix or #Amazon. But yes, I think #DirecTV could hurt them as well. $NFLX $AMZN

Danny Straus 7 years ago Member's comment

I tried #DirecTV Now. Wasn't bad, but yes, a bit buggy. Like if I stopped watching an on-demand program, and tried to pick up where I left off the next day, it would not remember and make me start from the beginning. PLUS since they do NOT let you fast forward, I'd have to sit through the entire program again to catch up. I understand not letting people fast forward through the commercials, but I should be able to fast fwd through the programs themselves!

Ayelet Wolf 7 years ago Member's comment

I had the same issue. Plus it was the same commercials over and over and over again. I was literally going batty. You really can't binge watch on #DirectTvNow the way you can on Netflix $NFLX.

Gary Anderson 7 years ago Contributor's comment

Some people find Netflix by itself far too limiting.

Duanne Johnson 7 years ago Member's comment

That's a good point, but many people also have #Hulu or #Amazon's Instant Video. With Amazon in particular you can purchase additional subscriptions al a carte, like #HBO.

#DTV along with these options are going to kill the cable companies unless they adopt a similar streaming model that's more affordable.

Alexa Graham 7 years ago Member's comment

@[Gary Anderson](user:4798) and @[Duanne Johnson](user:7505) are right in that the cable TV packages will bleed customers. But it won't kill the cable companies... they are the ones who make streaming possible by selling us internet access. They'll just charge us more.

Gary Anderson 7 years ago Contributor's comment

Interesting point. At what point will cable companies just stop offering channels, like they want to choose which websites get to download faster as they oppose net neutrality. However, this would be risky for cable, who stand to alienate millions upon millions of Americans if they ever try to limit channels by price.