"We know not all exposures are equal. If you get a big viral load it will hit far far harder." How do we know that? How does one send a "big" viral load vs. a small one? Can you please clarify? Do you mean like breathing on someone vs. coughing/spitting on them?

Realistically, how can they even test for that? And is there some magical cut off, that on a child's 10th birthday he/she suddenly becomes infectious? I suspect a lot of these scientific studies are assumptions and guesses at best.

I'm not sure we can know how contagious kids are. Most will be asymptomatic (we know that much). But as a result, how many are being tested, and how much contact tracing is really being done? Kids are still a bit of a mystery here.

Great read. Very thorough.

I've used #Facebook's #Workplace. It's great. The company should definitely through more resources behind it.

Agreed.

Thanks for clearing that up, I had been wondering about it.

Thanks for the share, very interesting!

While I lack your vehemence, I absolutely concur with the spirit of your statements. What you say is absolutely true. But what is the solution? I am at a loss.