‘Bad’ Versus ‘Good’ USD Rally; What Does It Mean For USD Trade?
The US dollar started 2017 with a bang, but that faded away quite quickly. What kind of rally is good for the dollar? Here is the view from Morgan Stanley:
Here is their view, courtesy of eFXnews:
The USD advance witnessed early last year was EM focused and in this sense, it was a ‘bad’ rally. When the USD rallies against EM,global economic costs tend to be high, as opposed to a ‘good’ rally where the USD rallies against low-yielding currencies such as the EUR and JPY.
The BIS has shown that EM currency weakness that pushes local funding costs higher by reducing EM access to international funding pools creates growth-reducing second-round effects. Seeing the USD higher against low-yielding currencies is supportive of global growth. This applies especially in the current situation, with low-yielding sovereign curves still tradingnear levels which we classify as leaving yield curves in ‘exhausted’ positions. EUR and JPY weakness is beneficial as it allows the ECB and BoJ to push local real yield levels down to desired levels. In this respect, low-yielding currency weakness against a rising USD is what we would call ‘good USD strength’.
Recent USD strength has been ‘good USD strength’. China’s currency is in a more difficult position. As low-yielding currencies fall, the RMB’s TWI trades higher unless China allows USDCNY to break higher. A higher RMB-TWI provides an unwanted decline in China’s relative competitive position, but a higher USDCNY may make it more difficult to keep capital outflows at bay.Failing to contain capital outflows may push RMB funding costs higher. China is clearly impacted by the USD rallying against low-yielding currencies,hence USD investors need to keep China’s currency moves in focus.
Border adjustment supportive of USD. Another USD bullish factor over the coming weeks and months will be the threat of protectionist measures by the new administration. As we wrote before the holidays the House Republicans have proposed converting the corporate income tax into a destination-based cash flow taxation system that would ‘border adjust’ by not taxing revenues from exports and disallowing dedication for the cost of imports. This would essentially have the same impact as an export subsidy and import tariff in equal size (20% based on the new corporate tax rate being proposed). USD would have to rise 25% on a trade weighted basis in order to offset the impact of these provisions on USD exporters and importers (which is what proponents of the plan argue will happen). We are more skeptical but still think this will be a big deal for USD; we believe a 10-15% rise in USD on the back of the policy is reasonable…
Disclaimer: Foreign exchange (Forex) trading carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The risk grows as the leverage is higher. Investment objectives, risk appetite and the trader's level of experience should be carefully weighed before entering the Forex market. There is always a possibility of losing some or all of your initial investment / deposit, so you should not invest money which you cannot afford to lose. The high risk that is involved with currency trading must be known to you. Please ask for advice from an independent financial advisor before entering this market. Any comments made on Forex Crunch or on other sites that have received permission to republish the content originating on Forex Crunch reflect the opinions of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of any of Forex Crunch's authorized authors. Forex Crunch has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: Omissions and errors may occur. Any news, analysis, opinion, price quote or any other information contained on Forex Crunch and permitted re-published content should be taken as general market commentary. This is by no means investment advice. Forex Crunch will not accept liability for any damage, loss, including without limitation to, any profit or loss, which may either arise directly or indirectly from use of such information.