Eurozone Target2 imbalances have touched or exceeded the crisis levels hit in 2012 when Greece was on the verge of leaving the Eurozone. Others have noted the growing imbalances as well.

I had a couple of questions for the ECB regarding Target2, which they have answered, I believe disingenuously.

First, we will explain Target2, then we will take a look at various charts, viewpoints, and the email exchange with the ECB.

Target2 Background

Target2 stands for Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement System. It is a reflection of capital flight from the “Club-Med” countries in Southern Europe (Greece, Spain, and Italy) to banks in Northern Europe.

Pater Tenebrarum at the Acting Man blog provides this easy to understand example: “Spain imports German goods, but no Spanish goods or capital have been acquired by any private party in Germany in return. The only thing that has been ‘acquired’ is an IOU issued by the Spanish commercial bank to the Bank of Spain in return for funding the payment.”

This is not the same as an auto loan from a dealer or a bank. In the case of Target2, central banks are guaranteeing the IOU.

Target2 also encompasses people yanking deposits from a bank in their country and parking them in a bank in another country. Greece is a nice example, and the result was capital controls.

If Italy or Greece (any country) were to leave the Eurozone and default on the Target2 balance, the rest of the countries would have to make up the default according to their percentage weight in the Eurozone.

Target2 Imbalances

Those numbers are as of December 2016. A check of the Bundesbank Target2 Balance as of January 31, 2017 shows a new record high of €797 billion.

As of December 2016, if Italy were to exit the Eurozone, Italy would owe €356.6 billion to Germany, Luxembourg, and a couple other small creditors.

What’s the likelihood Italy could ever pay back €356.6 billion?

Unpayable debts

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard at the Telegraph notes the unpayable debts, then asks Are Eurozone Central Banks Still Solvent?

Mish Questions for the ECB – January 27, 2017

Many media reports suggest the growing target2 imbalance in Italy is a sign of capital flight. ECB president Mario Draghi said it was a function of ECB asset purchases. Can you explain why Draghi is right or wrong?

Please also explain the growing target2 imbalance at the ECB itself.

Thanks
Mish

ECB Response – February 15, 2017

Dear Mr. Shedlock,

Thank you for your email and please accept our apologies for the late reply.

The implementation of the APP affects TARGET balances through cross-border settlement of our purchases. For more information on this particular mechanism, please see ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 7 / 2016 – Box 2: TARGET balances and the asset purchase programme (pages 21-24).

As regards the ECB’s own Target balance, when the ECB purchases securities under the APP, the ECB credits the account of the respective counterparty. Such counterparties are credit institutions, which cannot hold accounts with the ECB, but instead, hold accounts with national central banks. Therefore, payment for a security by the ECB automatically increases the ECB’s TARGET liability (but not necessarily the overall TARGET balance). This is discussed in the Bundesbank’s March 2016 Monthly Report (pages 53-55).

With best regards,

TARGET Hotline
EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Disingenuous ECB Response

I have been talking about Target2 imbalances for years, and I do not accept ECB’s response straight up.

Euro intelligence also discussed this very question recently. They have it correct, as follows, emphasis mine:

One of the barometers of tension in the Eurozone is the number of articles in the German press questioning the euro’s advantages to the country. The publication of the latest Target2 imbalances is not helping soothe nerves. As of end January, the German surplus was at an all-time record of €796 billion, while Italy’s deficit was at a record €364 billion. The ECB argues that the reason for the gap is not the same as it was during the Eurozone crisis when the imbalances reflected capital flight.

Philip Plickert writes in FAZ that this argument does not tell the full story. It is true, of course, that international banks based in London sell bonds to the Bank of Italy from their Frankfurt-based branches – so that the asset purchases result in transfers of central bank money from Italy to Germany. But why do the sellers not replenish their portfolios with purchases of Italian bonds, shares or other assets? Instead, they take the money and invest in Germany. So this is still capital flight – except that it works indirectly through the asset purchase programme.

Simple Target2 Explanation

Reader Lars writes: “Target 2 is a settlement system. When imbalances arise it’s because transactions are not settled. For example, Luigi in Italy transfers his €1 million from his Monte dei Paschi (MdP) account to his new Deutsche Bank account. MdP does not have the €1 million and has to borrow it from Bank of Italy. The Bank of Italy has to borrow the €1 million from Bundesbank. So at the end of the day, Luigi gets the €1 million into his account in DB but the Bank of Italy now owes €1 million to Bundesbank.”

Do that long enough and this is what happens:

1. The Banca d’Italia, Italy’s central bank, owes a record €364 billion to creditors, 22 percent of GDPand rising.
2. The Banco de España, Spain’s central bank owes €328 billion to creditors, almost 30 percent of GDP.
3. Other nations owe smaller amounts.

Tenebrarum at the Acting Man blog commented via email “I agree with the eurointelligence view that the steep Italian and Spanish deficits are still a testament to capital shunning various countries. To put it very simply: people managing large sums of Other People’s Money for institutions subject to fiduciary duty continue to have doubts about the euro’s survival, and rightly so."

Reader Lars replied: “It seems to me that the ECB is trying to complicate matters and kick the ball into the tall grass. In regards to the ECB's €160 billion Target2 deficit, it might be the case that the ECB has borrowed from Bundesbank and then lent the money to other national central banks (NCBs) because the Bundesbank has not been willing to do all the heavy lifting itself. Is the Bundesbank shunning risk at local NCBs?”

Rating Agencies Where Art Thou?

The rating agencies should be all over this issue but they are not. Here are two possible explanations.

1. The rating agencies are in bed with central banks or creditors
2. They do not understand Target2

Huge Insurmountable Problem

Target 2 is one of the least discussed and least understood problems in the Eurozone.

Jens Weidmann, Bundesbank president, allowed nearly €800 billion in credit to build on his watch. One has to wonder: Is Weidmann moving into illegal territory?

Egon von Greyerz, Founder & Managing Partner, Matterhorn Asset Management AG, made a comment similar to what I have stated many times: “Germany is in bigger trouble than Italy, Spain, or Portugal. Those countries can’t pay so Germany will have to foot the bill.”

Alternatively, the Bundesbank and the ECB are going to print money to cover those losses!

Greece alone is unlikely to trigger a crisis now, but Italy, Spain, or France could.

Fuse is Lit

The fuse is lit, multiple fuses actually.

1. Italy Increasingly Likely to Abandon the Euro
2. “Italeave” Odds Increase: Rebellion in Italy, Matteo Renzi’s PD Party to Split
3. French Elections: Another “Unthinkable” Result Coming Up?

Gold’s Reaction

Recent strength in gold is likely based on increasing doubts central banks are once again out of control.

Of course, central banks were never really in control, but appearances matter.

For further discussion, please consider Rate Hike Cycles vs. the US Dollar: Rate Hikes Bad for Gold?