Potential Investment Implications & Opportunities Of The US Elections

It seems as if in every meeting I have had lately with clients, questions about the upcoming U.S. election and its implications for markets are the first to come up and, while I won’t opine on who will be the likely winner, I discuss in this article some of the potential broader market impacts of this rather contentious debate.

By Heidi Richardson (BlackRockBlog.com)

The November election will be historic in many ways, but the long-term implications of either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump winning will likely have less of an impact than many market participants are anticipating. If history is any guide, election results have had a relatively minimal impact on longer-term U.S. or global equity returns, according to Bloomberg data and the BlackRock Investment Institute. It also hasn’t seemed to matter much whether the president belongs to the Republican or Democratic party.

Instead, factors such as inflation, interest rates and global growth are much more important to markets and, while these areas are a focal point for Federal Reserve (Fed) policy, they remain largely outside of presidential control, except to the extent that the president nominates (and the Senate approves) the Fed chairman and governors.

Nevertheless, we do expect some short-term market volatility leading up to the election and will keep an eye on certain sectors––health care, financials and infrastructure, for example––which thus far have been hot topics for the candidates. Since real policy changes wouldn’t likely occur until 2017 (and beyond), this short-term volatility may create more attractive entry points in select areas that appear attractive....

Health Care

This sector has historically underperformed in election years (source: Bloomberg), due in large part to concerns over pricing pressure on the biotech and pharmaceuticals subsectors...[so,] over the short term, we don’t believe the election and a new president will have a big impact on health care stocks’ fundamentals but,.given the two candidates’ opposing views on health care, however, there could well be longer-term implications on policy changes...Remember that implementing any real, significant changes to the health care system will need to pass through Congress and will likely take years, not months. That said, volatility and fundamentals aren’t always aligned and a selloff triggered by regulation rhetoric may create selective buying opportunities in the near term.

Financials

...[This sector] could also be impacted in a similar fashion. Again, meaningful regulations could take time, but campaign rhetoric may increase volatility. We believe the path of the Fed’s rate hike policy will have a bigger effect on the sector’s fundamentals. While we expect one more interest rate hike this year given Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen’s most recent comments at Jackson Hole, financials may benefit from widening net interest margins (the spread between what banks make on loans and what they pay for deposits.)

Infrastructure

Perhaps infrastructure spending, a rare area of agreement between the two candidates (although they disagree on how to fund such spending) is where investors can find potential opportunities. As the campaign debate continues to discuss job creation and economic growth, there has been a renewed investor focus on infrastructure spending and transportation. Additionally, Fed Governor John C. Williams of San Francisco recently published a paper suggesting a shifting focus from monetary policy to fiscal policy and an emphasis on economic growth and a higher inflation target. This likely bodes well for the sector...Keep in mind, [however, that] there could be significant delay from a proposal of greater infrastructure spending to passage of a bill and actual disbursement of money.

Investment Strategies to Consider

While this election season is likely to be filled with surprises, investors may also want to:

  • consider strategies that aim to minimize equity market volatility and potentially provide downside protection or
  • take a look at quality companies, characterized by high profitability, steady earnings and low leverage, which have typically outperformed when market volatility rises...[and] consider:
    • the iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH)
    • the iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF)...
    • the iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF),
    • the iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT),
    • the iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ)...
    • the iShares EDGE MSCI Min Vol USA ETF (USMV) and
    • the iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL).

This article may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (...) and/or reformatted (structure, title/subtitles, font) by the editorial team of munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!) to provide a faster ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.