Shell Versus Shale

Who says that the U.S. oil supply picture in not getting in balance? Oil supply in the US fell by 7.2 million barrels down over 50 million barrels since the end of March. It would have been over 60 million barrels if it were not for the reclassification of oil released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. That puts supply at the lowest level this year and 7.1% below last year. US crude production faltered last week, a sign that US shale producers are getting wobbly. Yet Shell posted better than expected blow away earnings as opposed to shale firms that are struggling to stay solvent.

Shell (RDS-A) revenue came in at $72.13 billion vs. expected $67.78 billion, according to Reuters in a bright spot for bigger oil. Shell made money on reefing as strong margins and growing demand against a backdrop of near record productions for products boosted the bottom line. Reuters reported that Shell’s net profit (on a current cost of supplies (CCS) basis) at $3.6 billion, up a whopping 245 percent from $1 billion for the second quarter of 2016. Shells CEO said that Shell promised to "remain very disciplined" to avoid seeing earnings impacted by the low prices of oil. He also suggested that oil prices lately have been driven by market sentiment and not fundamentals.

Shell’s good fortunes are not being repeated in the shale front. Yesterday, Hess Oil (HES) said it would be cutting spending and exploratory expenditures forecast to $2.15B from the original guidance of $2.25B after posting a bigger than expected loss. This comes after the CEO at Halliburton said that rig count growth is showing signs of plateauing and customers are tapping the brakes. Hess sold assets in the Permian basin but is still trying to entice investors with the promise of more oil. The Hess cut was lower than Anadarko's $300 million capex cut due to losses in shale oil production. Sanchez Energy (SN) also announced $75 million to $100 million in 2018 spending cuts as shale oil is not yielding them a profitable price.

This comes as U.S. oil production fell by 19,000 barrels a day. Most of the drop was in Alaska and the lower 48 saw production rise in the Gulf of Mexico, but shale production gains are still below estimates of growth. More cuts in capex and rig counts slow down, decline rates and capped wells could hurt as many shale guys are bleeding cash. OPEC cuts do matter and there are clear signs the market is on a path to a much tighter market than we have had since the global financial crisis.

Still oil is overbought technically and we need to see sustained follow through or consideration to perhaps make that big move. We have kept a bullish outlook as we knew that despite the price, the oil market was focusing on present supply and not future tightness due to a change in market players that the future would some day come. That day is here and now and we still maintain that oil can break out and hit 70 by the end of the year. Oil inventories globally will continue to drain a record pace at elevated prices. Shale producers will be in the process of pulling back for the rest of this year.

Shale, at this point, is not a swing producer. Unlike Saudi Arabia that can quickly raise or lower output in a crisis, shale producers have a much slower reaction time. Someday shale will get there but they are not there yet.

Gasoline demand also soared once again as concerns about demand are now in the rear-view mirror. Supply also fell by 1 million barrels. U.S. oil exports and exports of diesel and gasoline gain as the US becomes refiner to the world. Venezuelan sanctions have not hit their oil exports yet but if it does, US gas prices will pop. Tensions with Iran and Nigerian oil disruption added support.   

Disclosure:

None.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Moon Kil Woong 6 years ago Contributor's comment

Shale is more of a foil than a swing producer. Given it is currently being run up on bank financing and not profitability, I would not expect it to increase substantially if there was a large jump in demand unless prices went above $80 a barrel. Even then, unless prices stayed steady significantly higher shale producers will still have a hard time paying off their debts let alone justifying even more debt to expand.

All oil is now realizing it is the bankers causing the glut more than anyone else. Blaming Saudi Arabia is naïve. As long as bankers keep financing unprofitable wells and production around the globe the pump and dump at any amount of loss will continue because the financing of it forces pumping after development regardless of the loss.