FICO Scores Change – Is Nothing Sacred?

By Michael Taylor of Bankers Anonymous
Date: Friday, August 8, 2014 10:32 AM EST

Far be it for me to stand in the way of progress, but did a little part of you die when you read this morning that Fair Isaac Corp will slightly alter its FICO score formula to make it easier for people to get loans? Is nothing sacred?

Decline of Western Civilization? My immediate thought was that deflated feeling I got when I heard, in 1995, that the College Board would recenter the SAT to 500, because average scores kept dropping. Ugh. How would I know whether my SAT scores are higher than my kids’ scores? We can’t even compare now. 

How will kids develop a competitive drive if they don’t know how their old man did on the SAT? I remember when not every kid would get a shiny ribbons for “participation.” Instead, we would only get the giant trophy if you WON, and pummeled your youthful opponent into abject submission. I mean, I remember when I used to walk all the way to school, uphill both ways, in a driving blizzard.

And back for lunch. And we loved it. FICO scores Anyway…back to FICO. According to the WSJ this morning, the makers of FICO will drop ‘settled’ delinquent accounts from their formula for calculating their key number used by practically every US lender in consumer credit decision-making.

The result is that for people who had made late payments or let debts go to collections – but later paid or settled the accounts – the negative mark on their credit will drop off quickly. The second change in the FICO formula is to de-emphasize the negative effect of delinquent medical bills. Since FICO scores have traditionally been quite sensitive to a history of delinquent payments, the result is that millions of people could see their scores rise as a result of the formula change. Higher scores theoretically means that more people will have access to credit.

The point of the FICO score – for lenders – is to offer a snapshot of the probability of future consumer loan defaults. Fair Isaac says they studied whether the history of delinquent – but paid – accounts mattered to calculating these probabilities. Following the study, they said they could reliably drop the paid collection accounts, as well as lower the impact of medical delinquency and still maintain the same predicative power in the score. A caveat Although this change made the front page of the WSJ this morning, the real impact could be completely unrealized.

1 2

Honest and Reflective Conversation about Finance © 2013 Bankers Anonymous. Sign-up for my newsletter so you never miss what's happening.


Sign in with
Use TalkMarkets options