Jobless Claims Stay At Bubble Record Pace

The headline, fictional, seasonally adjusted (SA) number of initial unemployment claims for last week came in at 282,000 on Thursday. The Wall Street economist crowd consensus guess was 274,000.

We’re not interested in the expectations game. Instead, we focus on the actual trend. Actual claims were 251,435, which is another record low for the week. The actual weekly totals first set an all time record low in September 2013. That trend has continued since then, with each weak either being at or near record levels for that week each year. Previous similar periods were associated with the tops of bubbles, even continuing beyond the bubble peaks, as employers seem to take their cues from stock prices, and not vice versa.

The Department of Labor (DoL) also reports the unmanipulated numbers that state unemployment offices actually count and report to the DoL each week. This week it said, “The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 251,435 in the week ending May 23, an increase of 7,950 (or 3.3 percent) from the previous week. The seasonal factors had expected an increase of 1,924 (or 0.8 percent) from the previous week. There were 275,412 initial claims in the comparable week in 2014. ”

 

Initial Claims and Annual Rate of Change- Click to enlarge

Initial Claims and Annual Rate of Change- Click to enlarge

 

The fourth week of May is a swing week, with claims sometimes up, sometimes down. The actual change this week was an increase of 8,000 (rounded). That compared with the 10 year average for that week of +2,000 (rounded). Claims fell by 12,000 in the comparable week last year. Week to week changes are noisy. What’s important is that trend remains on track.

In terms of the trend, actual claims were 8.7% lower than the same week a year ago. Since 2010 the annual change rate has mostly fluctuated between -5% and -15%. This week’s data was within that range. There’s no sign of an uptick in the trend of firings and layoffs.

There were 1,777 claims per million of nonfarm payroll employees in the current week. This was a record low, well below the May 2007 previous record of 2,007. That occurred just a few months before the carnage of mass layoffs that was to begin later that year. Employers were still clueless that the bubble had ended and that that would have devastating effects.

 

Record Low Claims Per Million Workers- Click to enlarge

Record Low Claims Per Million Workers- Click to enlarge

 

Likewise, the housing bubble had already peaked in 2006 but the stock market continued on its merry way, not finally ending its run until September 2007. The initial claims data was forming a slight negative divergence in 2007. It was a subtle warning of the underlying deterioration, but similar periods in the past had not correlated with market tops. In addition, at the 2000 stock top, claims gave virtually no advance warning of what was to come. We cannot depend on this data for advance warning of a decline in stock prices, although there should at least concurrent confirmation.

 

Initial Claims Inverted and Stock Prices- Click to enlarge

Initial Claims Inverted and Stock Prices- Click to enlarge

 

We have noted before in these updates that the oil price collapse may be analogous to the housing bubble peak in 2006. The impact of the oil price collapse started to show up in state claims data in the November-January period. While most states show the level of initial claims well below the levels of a year ago, in the oil producing states of Texas, North Dakota, Louisiana, and Oklahoma claims have been above year ago levels since the turn of the year. North Dakota and Louisiana claims first increased above the year ago level in November. Texas reversed in late January. Oklahoma, joined the wake shortly after that.

With the rebound in the price of oil since the first quarter lows, the increase in the number of unemployment claims in the oil states had moderated, but last week they weakened again. In the most current state data, for the May 9 week, claims were up in Texas by 0.4% year to year, (vs. +8% in the previous week), Louisiana +18% (vs. +29%), and North Dakota +117% (vs. +71%). Oklahoma was up by 26% (vs. +28%). There’s been wide variance in these numbers week to week but the trend of claims being significantly higher than the same week last year has been persistent. However, Texas has improved significantly in recent weeks and is on the verge of showing decreasing claims year over year.

In the May 16 week, 10 states had more claims than in the same week in 2014. That was down from 13 the prior week. This number fluctuates widely week to week with many states near even. At the end of 2014, 8 were up year to year. At the end of the third quarter of 2014 there were just 5 but in early April this year the number had risen to 22. The impact of the wave of oil layoffs has subsided with the rebound in oil prices as producers take a wait and see approach to layoffs.

The 22 states that were higher in early April gives us a benchmark to watch, similar to an advance decline line in the stock market. If the number of states showing a year to year increase in claims should exceed that, it should be an indication that the trend is beginning to reverse, and that the the trend of actual total claims should begin to reverse.

I track the daily real time Federal Withholding Tax data in the Wall Street Examiner Professional Edition. The year to year growth rate in withholding taxes in real time is now running +6.3% in nominal terms. This is down from a peak of over 8% in February, but up from +5.1% a month ago. The May 12 week was the reference week for the May payrolls survey. The numbers for that week support the likelihood of a gain in May payrolls similar to April’s .

The claims data shows no sign yet of any cooling in this financial engineering bubble economy, with even the oil patch layoffs moderating. This will continue to encourage the Fed to engage in the charade of pretending to raise interest rates sooner rather than later. The real problems will start when the Fed finds that in order to get rates up, and keep them up, it will need to begin shrinking its balance sheet.

Get regular updates on the machinations of the Fed, Treasury, Primary Dealers and foreign central banks in the US ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.