Trump On Trade – A Primer
One of Trump’s primary campaign themes was that other countries are taking advantage of the US. He said he would tear up trade agreements unfair to the US and impose tariffs on offending countries. And as President, he is following through on his promises. First, he abandoned the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Next were tariffs imposed on dishwashers and solar panels. Then, tariffs on aluminum and steel of 10% and 25%, respectively, were announced. And Trump is now threatening to levy $50 billion in tariffs and penalties on China for the theft of trade secrets, etc. The following provides background on US trade, spells out the likely outcome of these actions and the fallacies underlying them.
Background on US Trade
Table 1 provides US trade data. The US imports more goods than it exports. In contrast, it has a significant positive balance on services. We hear that the US is reducing its dependency on oil. It is definitely down some, but it still runs a trade deficit of $111 billion with the rest of the world.
Table 1. – US International Goods and Services Trade Balances
(bil. US$)
Source:
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Table 2 lists the leading US trading partners. The European Union is the largest followed by China and the immediate US neighbors, Canada and Mexico.
Table 2. – US Leading Trade Partners, 2016
(bil. US$)
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Countries in the “Crosshairs”
a. Aluminum and Steel
Table 3 provides data on the largest providers of Aluminum and Iron/Steel. The countries in green are exempt, at least temporarily from the new US import tariffs. China will be hit hard.
Table 3. – Aluminum and Iron/Steel Imports
(bil. US$)
Source:
Dishwashers and Solar Panels
Table 4 lists the largest suppliers of dishwashers and solar panels to the US. Once again, China is a leading supplier.
Table 4. – Dishwasher and Solar Panel Imports
(bil. US$)
Source:
Retaliation
China has made it clear it will not “sit on its hands” and has threatened retaliatory steps. Table 5 indicates the leading US exports to China. And rest assured, the DC lobbyists for all of these exporters are hard at work in DC in hopes of “working things out” with China.
Table 5. – Leading US Exports to China
(bil. US$)
Source:
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/World Trade Organization (WTO)
Past trade wars, aiming to protect domestic industry via various trade barriers such as tariffs or quotas, have been extremely destructive for all parties involved. As a result, the WTO and its predecessor GATT were established as vehicles to avoid trade wars. Critical to the effectiveness of WTO is agreement by all members to abide by its arbitration process to settle disputes. As has happened with other treaties, there is concern that Trump will not abide by its processes.
The US played a major role in getting GATT/WTO established, and it has been active in using the WTO’s arbitration process. According to WTO data, the US has lodged 124 complaints for arbitration and other countries have complained about US trading practices 144 times. In contrast, there have only been 39 complaints registered against China, with 21 of them lodged by the US.
Trump Fallacies
a. Blaming China for Job Losses in Manufacturing
Trump regularly lambastes China for stealing US manufacturing jobs via unfair practices. In actual fact, my research and that of the McKinsey Global Institute have concluded that the vast majority of manufacturing jobs have been lost to automation and no “unfair labor practices.” And this finding applies globally to almost all goods and services industries.
b. Helping American Workers
By imposing tariffs on aluminum, steel, and solar panels, Trump wanted to help US produces of same. But in fact, there are more Americans working in industries that use these products than there are in the aluminum, steel, and solar panel industries.
c. Trade Wars
Trump has been quoted as saying “trade wars are good and easy to win.” History is not on Trump’s side. Past trade wars have been devastating to all parties. And as noted above, the US has been a leader in getting both GATT and the WTO established. And the US has worked hard to use the WTO arbitration processes to protect its domestic industries. If Trump chooses to act unilaterally, he will find that trade wars are not good and there are no winners.
Conclusions
As the stock market sell-off suggests, the world is entering dangerous and uncertain times. If Trump and his aides are not willing to submit their claims of unfair trade practices to WTO arbitration, there will be retaliatory actions. And nobody can foretell where this will lead.
I thought I read that China pledged to not retaliate.
Sadly the trade wars are premised on the wrong thing. Importing low margin products keeps inflation low and is base products for higher margin goods that the US sells elsewhere. For instance, bar shoes from China and the high end margins on Nike which are sold throughout the world disappears. Sadly, a full on trade war may create others complaining of the US dominating all the high margin businesses which is handily does. Is this fair? Yes, for the same reason China dominates low income production because it imports tons of low income stuff and assembles it cheaply and efficiently and skirts environmental concerns.
If we get into tit for tat things erode rapidly. Also sadly US farmers may be the biggest losers because it is clear and obvious the US government subsidizes them which is the argument for tariffs by the US usually to China and elsewhere. In the end, protectionism decreases efficiency, increases inflation, causes wars over resources because key resources instantly become unavailable for some, and it slows economies even into negative growth which is why it has been the harbinger of global recessions and depressions. Last, it may end the cuddly relationship which funds our ever expanding deficit and enables the US dollar to be the global reserve currency which is already coming under increasing threat. This would lead to even higher interest rates, slower growth, inflation, shortages, and decreased purchasing power.
I am hopeful this does not happen, however, one needs to look at and consider the real potential outcomes of the trade war being brewed. My suggestion, get into stocks that have low debt and positive cash flow and out of stocks with high debt and negative cash flows unless they are in an industry that will do well with rising inflation (which are very few industries mainly oil). The US exports oil, but is still heavily dependent on foreign oil despite what some say.
Insightful as usual.
Good read.
Moon Kil Woong: thanks for comment. We used to talk about comparative advantage where you produced what you were relatively good at producing. And as you say, this has gone pretty well for both China and the US over the last 4 decades. The future? I am hopeful. The US lobbyists for the farmers and other groups that China would target are working overtime to avoid a trade war. And while Trump is clueless about this stuff, he has become a politician and does not want to see his blue collar base hurt.